User Tools

Site Tools


archive:nmk322

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

archive:nmk322 [2026/02/09 22:19] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1archive:nmk322 [2026/08/13 15:21] (current) – [Announcements] azman
Line 9: Line 9:
 [20241017] Updating this for 202425s1 Academic Session. [20241017] Updating this for 202425s1 Academic Session.
  
 +===== Lab Project Info =====
 +
 +<file text nmk322-202526s1_lab_project_info.txt>
 +-----------
 +Lab Project
 +-----------
 +
 +Note: This is a group project (group of 2-4).
 +
 +Develop a product based on an 8051 microcontroller. The only required feature
 +is a wireless (e.g. bluetooth, GSM, WiFi) interfacing, which can be a user
 +interface or a module-to-module interface. The wireless data communication must
 +be bi-directional. Additional controller(s) (e.g. ESP32, Arduino) may be used,
 +but the core system MUST run on 8051. The use of multiple controllers will be
 +questioned during Q&A.
 +
 +Overall evaluation will be based on:
 +1) Product demonstration (25%)
 +2) Product brochure/poster (25%)
 +3) Technical specification @ user manual (25%)
 +4) Technical competency @ Individual Q&A (25%)
 +
 +Having aesthetic features (WOW factor) in your application/product
 +will assist towards getting better grades. However, please note that your
 +product needs to actually WORK (function as expected) for the WOW factor to
 +be considered. 
 +
 +Each group will be assigned a group ID. To make the product ‘realistic’, each
 +group should create a virtual company that has the group ID in its name (e.g.
 +SmartY1, X1Box) to brand the product. Consequently, the product should also
 +have a name (e.g. SmartY1 System-2000, X1Box Tool-Z1). Note that this is not
 +a requirement, rather a suggestion that hopefully can inspire development of
 +an interesting product.
 +
 +Deliverables:
 +
 +- email submission (24-hour BEFORE product demonstration)
 +  = product brochure/poster (softcopy)
 +  = technical specification @ user manual (softcopy)
 +
 +- demonstration of a working product (@application)
 +  = please provide a 'commercial'-grade product brochure/poster (hardcopy)
 +
 +- individual Q/A for technical competency (post-demonstration)
 +  = mainly for individual evaluation
 +
 +DUE: WK14/14 (Lab Session)
 +
 +-----------------
 +EVALUATION RUBRIC
 +-----------------
 +
 +Product Demonstration: 10% Overall
 +
 +A - product is working, aesthethically appealing 
 +B - product is somewhat working and with appealing feature
 +C - product is showing some response or with appealing feature
 +D - product is at least assembled
 +F - not available
 +
 +## Refer Gform:
 +# Product Core Functionality - 30%
 +# Product Aesthetics - 20%
 +# Product Branding - 30%
 +# Prototype Completeness - 20%
 +## Individual:
 +# Team (@peer) evaluation (OVERALL)
 +# - Reduced if contributed less than max
 +
 +Product Brochure/Poster: 10% Overall
 +
 +A - excellent (compact/concise) product info (with sales/after sales info)
 +B - nice product info and/or sales/after sales info
 +C - satisfactory product info and/or sales/after sales info
 +D - at least some  product info or sales/after sales info
 +F - not available
 +
 +# Brochure Aesthetics - 40%
 +# Marketing value (poster, brand here?) - 30%
 +# > branding, wow factor
 +# Informative - 10%
 +# > contact info , sales/locatin info
 +# Overall (submission reward/penalty here) - 20%
 +## Individual:
 +# Team (@peer) evaluation (DOC)
 +# - Reduced if contributed less than max
 +
 +Product User Manual: 10% Overall
 +
 +A - excellent, with sufficient end-user and/or technical information
 +B - nice, with sufficient end-user OR technical information
 +C - satisfactory, with both end-user and technical information available
 +D - at least some end-user OR technical information available
 +F - not available
 +
 +# User-friendly Info - 40%
 +# Technical Info - 20%
 +# Aesthetics - 20%
 +# Overall (submission reward/penalty here) - 20%
 +## Individual:
 +# Team (@peer) evaluation (DOC)
 +# - Reduced if contributed less than max
 +
 +Product Development (Q&A): 10% Overall
 +
 +A - excellent knowledge and contribution
 +B - good knowledge, fair contribution
 +C - sufficient knowledge, sufficient contribution
 +D - fairly competent or with some contribution
 +F - zero knowledge and without contribution
 +
 +A: 9-10, B:7-8, C:5-6, D:3-4, F:0-2
 +
 +# Code Quality - 40%
 +# Demo Overall - 40%
 +## Individual:
 +# Technical Q&A - 20%
 +# Team (@peer) evaluation (DEV)
 +# - Reduced if contributed less than max
 +</file>
  
 ===== Library Codes ===== ===== Library Codes =====
archive/nmk322.txt · Last modified: by azman

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki